Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 12, 1916

DocketNo. 15256

StatusPublished

This text of 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403 (Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403 (Ohio 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order of the said public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason the court finds that it is disclosed by the record that sufficient time had not elapsed after the former order of this court to sufficiently inform the court touching the different claims of the parties in the premises. And this court does not pass upon the other questions involved nor preclude itself from passing on any state of facts [404]*404which might be shown concerning the disputed matters covering' a longer and sufficient period of time.

Order affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the order of the said public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason the court finds that it is disclosed by the record that sufficient time had not elapsed after the former order of this court to sufficiently inform the court touching the different claims of the parties in the premises. And this court does not pass upon the other questions involved nor preclude itself from passing on any state of facts [404]*404which might be shown concerning the disputed matters covering' a longer and sufficient period of time.

Order affirmed.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 Ohio St. (N.S.) 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hocking-valley-railway-co-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1916.