Hockersmith v. Long

Court of Appeals of Texas

Hockersmith v. Long

1 White & W. 278

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 15, 1880

DocketNo. 581, Op. Book No. 2, p. 667

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 278 (Hockersmith v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hockersmith v. Long, 1 White & W. 278 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 554. Injunction; jurisdiction of county court. Suit was by injunction to restrain the collection of $65.25 claimed to be due the city of Tyler, the collection of which the city was endeavoring to enforce. A motion to dissolve the injunction, because the amount in controversy would not sustain the jurisdiction, was overruled and the injunction perpetuated. Held error.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 554. Injunction; jurisdiction of county court. Suit was by injunction to restrain the collection of $65.25 claimed to be due the city of Tyler, the collection of which the city was endeavoring to enforce. A motion to dissolve the injunction, because the amount in controversy would not sustain the jurisdiction, was overruled and the injunction perpetuated. Held error.

Reversed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hockersmith-v-long-texapp-1880.