Hockaday v. Brownlee

Fourth Circuit

Hockaday v. Brownlee

119 F. App'x 567

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 1, 2005·No. 04-2193·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James W. Hockaday appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hockaday v. Brownlee, No. CA-03-149-4 (E.D.Va. July 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James W. Hockaday appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hockaday v. Brownlee, No. CA-03-149-4 (E.D.Va. July 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Hockaday v. Brownlee, 119 F. App'x 567 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

119 F. App'x 567 (Hockaday v. Brownlee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related