Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n

936 So. 2d 652, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11177, 2006 WL 1816369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13861
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 2006·No. No. 4D05-2315·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner’s Ass’n, 695 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), this court reversed a summary judgment, concluding that a prior foreclosure judgment did not extinguish Appellant’s claim for waste for which there were issues of fact. This holding became the law of the case. After further litigation and appeals on other issues, the trial court failed to recognize this law of the case in again entering summary judgment against Hochstadt. Therefore, the summary judgment is reversed. Equity Residential Props. Trust v. Yates, 910 So.2d 401, 405 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Dicks v. Jenne, 740 So.2d 576, 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

On remand, the trial court shall also allow Appellant to amend the cross-claim separating the waste claim from any independent unpaid taxes claim, which, in accordance with our earlier decision, is not to be included in the waste claim.

STONE, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n, 936 So. 2d 652, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11177, 2006 WL 1816369 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

936 So. 2d 652 (Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES v. Yates
910 So. 2d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Dicks Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Jenne
740 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n
695 So. 2d 1324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)