Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n
695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119
Opinion
We affirm except for the issue involving whether the foreclosure judgment extinguished appellant’s cross-claim against the Sanctuary for waste. We conclude that the trial court erred in that regard, and reverse and remand so that Hochstadt, in his capacity as holder of the third mortgage, can pursue his claim for waste against the Sanctuary. We agree with the Sanctuary, however, that Hochstadt’s claim for waste would not include real estate taxes which the Sanctuary failed to pay after it had taken title to the property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n, 695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
695 So. 2d 1324 (Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n
882 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)