Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n
This text of 695 So. 2d 1324 (Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm except for the issue involving whether the foreclosure judgment extinguished appellant’s cross-claim against the Sanctuary for waste. We conclude that the trial court erred in that regard, and reverse and remand so that Hochstadt, in his capacity as holder of the third mortgage, can pursue his claim for waste against the Sanctuary. We agree with the Sanctuary, however, that Hochstadt’s claim for waste would not include real estate taxes which the Sanctuary failed to pay after it had taken title to the property.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hochstadt-v-sanctuary-homeowners-assn-fladistctapp-1997.