Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n

695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 9, 1997
DocketNo. 95-1122
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 695 So. 2d 1324 (Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowner's Ass'n, 695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm except for the issue involving whether the foreclosure judgment extinguished appellant’s cross-claim against the Sanctuary for waste. We conclude that the trial court erred in that regard, and reverse and remand so that Hochstadt, in his capacity as holder of the third mortgage, can pursue his claim for waste against the Sanctuary. We agree with the Sanctuary, however, that Hochstadt’s claim for waste would not include real estate taxes which the Sanctuary failed to pay after it had taken title to the property.

GLICKSTEIN, KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hochstadt v. Sanctuary Homeowners Ass'n
882 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7743, 1997 WL 375119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hochstadt-v-sanctuary-homeowners-assn-fladistctapp-1997.