Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hochstadt v. Grady

Hochstadt v. Grady

963 So. 2d 946, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13855, 2007 WL 2480982
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2007
DocketNo. 4D06-3709
StatusPublished

This text of 963 So. 2d 946 (Hochstadt v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hochstadt v. Grady, 963 So. 2d 946, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13855, 2007 WL 2480982 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Carlyle v. Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc., 842 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Korman v. Kent, 821 So.2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

SHAHOOD, C.J., WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Korman v. Kent
821 So. 2d 408 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Carlyle v. Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc.
842 So. 2d 1013 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
963 So. 2d 946, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 13855, 2007 WL 2480982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hochstadt-v-grady-fladistctapp-2007.