Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalo
309 A.D.2d 1218, 765 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10088
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalo. Read the opinion of the Court — 309 A.D.2d 1216 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 2, 2003·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Mahoney, J.), entered December 3, 2002, which granted plaintiff’s motion for “reargument/renewal” with respect to defendant Dana Mulivich’s motion and adhered to its original decision.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Hochreiter v Diocese of Buffalo ([appeal No. 1] 309 AD2d 1216 [2003]). Present — Pine, J.P., Hurl-butt, Scudder and Hayes, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalo, 309 A.D.2d 1218, 765 N.Y.S.2d 304, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).
309 A.D.2d 1218 (Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hochreiter v. Diocese of Buffalo
309 A.D.2d 1216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)