Hoch v. Chester

163 A.D. 907, 147 N.Y.S. 1116

This text of 163 A.D. 907 (Hoch v. Chester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoch v. Chester, 163 A.D. 907, 147 N.Y.S. 1116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Order modified by inserting therein a recital that the grounds of the injunction are that it appears by affidavits that defendant during the pendency of [908]*908the action is doing or procuring, or suffering to be done, or threatens or is about to do or procure or suffer to be done, an act in violation of plaintiff’s rights respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual; and as so modified the said order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D. 907, 147 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoch-v-chester-nyappdiv-1914.