Hoch v. Bass
This text of 19 A. 360 (Hoch v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned court below sustained the demurrer and dis[332]*332missed the bill, for the reason that the plaintiff had a complete remedy at law, and had not exhibited any grounds for equitable relief. In this we think he was right. She can recover her arrears of royalty, if any, by action of assumpsit; and, if possession of the premises is desired, and the defendants have forfeited their rights thereto, an action of ejectment is the appropriate remedy. She can pursue her legal remedies without depriving the defendants of their right of trial by jury.
Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 A. 360, 133 Pa. 328, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoch-v-bass-pactcomplberks-1890.