Hobson v. Lower

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Hobson v. Lower

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 225

DecidedNovember 6, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 225 (Hobson v. Lower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hobson v. Lower, 20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 225 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

WINCH, J.

The will under consideration in this ease gives all of the testator’s property to his widow in the following language: “for the term of her natural life, and with full power to hold and dispose of part or all ■of the same for her use and benefit as she may see fit. Upon the death' -of my said wife, if there should be any residue of said estate, it is my will that such residue shall be divided equally among my four chil■dren. ”

Following the decision in the case of Johnson v. Johnson, 51 Ohio St. 446 [38 N. E. Rep. 61], we hold that the widow is a quasi trustee for ithe remainder-men, to wit, the testator’s children.

[226]*226The petition alleging that the trustee has improvidently and wastefully used considerable sums in excess of the fair and reasonable expense of supporting and maintaining herself, has moved out of the state, and that the plaintiff, one of the remainder-men, fears that the estate will all be dissipated by the widow during her lifetime, we think she is called upon to answer the petition and therefore overrule her demurrer to it.

Henry and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WINCH, J.

The will under consideration in this ease gives all of the testator’s property to his widow in the following language: “for the term of her natural life, and with full power to hold and dispose of part or all ■of the same for her use and benefit as she may see fit. Upon the death' -of my said wife, if there should be any residue of said estate, it is my will that such residue shall be divided equally among my four chil■dren. ”

Following the decision in the case of Johnson v. Johnson, 51 Ohio St. 446 [38 N. E. Rep. 61], we hold that the widow is a quasi trustee for ithe remainder-men, to wit, the testator’s children.

[226]*226The petition alleging that the trustee has improvidently and wastefully used considerable sums in excess of the fair and reasonable expense of supporting and maintaining herself, has moved out of the state, and that the plaintiff, one of the remainder-men, fears that the estate will all be dissipated by the widow during her lifetime, we think she is called upon to answer the petition and therefore overrule her demurrer to it.

Henry and Marvin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobson-v-lower-ohcirctcuyahoga-1907.