Home/Supreme Court/Hobson v. Board of Elections

Hobson v. Board of Elections

402 U.S. 988, 29 L. Ed. 2d 154, 91 S. Ct. 1664, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2099
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 17, 1971·No. No. 1494·Published·Cited by 55 cases

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted on the basis of Mr. Justice Black’s dissent in United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U. S. 75, 105 (1947).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobson v. Board of Elections, 402 U.S. 988, 29 L. Ed. 2d 154, 91 S. Ct. 1664, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2099 (1971).

402 U.S. 988 (Hobson v. Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Indiana v. Gregory Lagrone
985 N.E.2d 66 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. Estate of Richardson
89 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (N.D. Iowa, 2000)
Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.
976 F. Supp. 818 (N.D. Iowa, 1997)
Standard Microsystems Corporation v. Texas Instruments Incorporated
916 F.2d 58 (Second Circuit, 1990)
State v. Lewis
561 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1989)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.
726 F. Supp. 62 (S.D. New York, 1989)
In Re Wyslak
94 B.R. 540 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
State v. Ashe
745 P.2d 1255 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987)
In re Baldwin-United Corp.
770 F.2d 328 (Second Circuit, 1985)
In Re Baldwin-United Corporation (Single Premium Deferred Annuities Insurance Litigation) Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin, Maine Attorney General James E. Tierney, Intervenor-Appellant
770 F.2d 328 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Murphy v. Gallagher
761 F.2d 878 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Austin Municipal Securities, Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Defendants
757 F.2d 676 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Goodridge v. Harvey Group Inc.
602 F. Supp. 78 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Stackhouse v. State
468 A.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
561 F. Supp. 1311 (S.D. New York, 1983)
In Re Casco Bay Lines, Inc.
25 B.R. 747 (First Circuit, 1982)
In re Boston & Providence Railroad
24 B.R. 558 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)
United States v. Velasquez, Cecilia, in No. 79-2737, Velasquez, Pauline, in No. 79-2777
626 F.2d 314 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
641 F.2d 880 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Petrone
499 F. Supp. 29 (S.D. New York, 1980)