Home/Supreme Court/Hobson v. Board of Elections

Hobson v. Board of Elections

402 U.S. 988, 29 L. Ed. 2d 154, 91 S. Ct. 1664, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2099
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 17, 1971
DocketNo. 1494
StatusPublished
Cited by55 cases

This text of 402 U.S. 988 (Hobson v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobson v. Board of Elections, 402 U.S. 988, 29 L. Ed. 2d 154, 91 S. Ct. 1664, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2099 (1971).

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins, is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted on the basis of Mr. Justice Black’s dissent in United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U. S. 75, 105 (1947).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Indiana v. Gregory Lagrone
985 N.E.2d 66 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2013)
Wells' Dairy, Inc. v. Estate of Richardson
89 F. Supp. 2d 1042 (N.D. Iowa, 2000)
Gunderson v. ADM Investor Services, Inc.
976 F. Supp. 818 (N.D. Iowa, 1997)
Standard Microsystems Corporation v. Texas Instruments Incorporated
916 F.2d 58 (Second Circuit, 1990)
State v. Lewis
561 A.2d 1153 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1989)
Maryland Casualty Co. v. W.R. Grace & Co.
726 F. Supp. 62 (S.D. New York, 1989)
In Re Wyslak
94 B.R. 540 (N.D. Illinois, 1988)
State v. Ashe
745 P.2d 1255 (Utah Supreme Court, 1987)
In re Baldwin-United Corp.
770 F.2d 328 (Second Circuit, 1985)
In Re Baldwin-United Corporation (Single Premium Deferred Annuities Insurance Litigation) Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin, Maine Attorney General James E. Tierney, Intervenor-Appellant
770 F.2d 328 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Murphy v. Gallagher
761 F.2d 878 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Austin Municipal Securities, Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Defendants
757 F.2d 676 (Fifth Circuit, 1985)
Goodridge v. Harvey Group Inc.
602 F. Supp. 78 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Stackhouse v. State
468 A.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
561 F. Supp. 1311 (S.D. New York, 1983)
In Re Casco Bay Lines, Inc.
25 B.R. 747 (First Circuit, 1982)
In re Boston & Providence Railroad
24 B.R. 558 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)
United States v. Velasquez, Cecilia, in No. 79-2737, Velasquez, Pauline, in No. 79-2777
626 F.2d 314 (Third Circuit, 1980)
Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
641 F.2d 880 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Petrone
499 F. Supp. 29 (S.D. New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 U.S. 988, 29 L. Ed. 2d 154, 91 S. Ct. 1664, 1971 U.S. LEXIS 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobson-v-board-of-elections-scotus-1971.