Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B.P.O.E.

9 A.2d 783, 123 N.J.L. 506, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 63
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 22, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A.2d 783 (Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B.P.O.E.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B.P.O.E., 9 A.2d 783, 123 N.J.L. 506, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 63 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Bodine, J.

The writ brings up for review the judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals reversing the judgment of the Hudson County Board of Taxation affirming the assessment upon defendant’s property in Hoboken for the year 1937. The result is that the property is found to be exempt under B. 8. 54:4-3.26. This statute is constitutional. Camden v. Camden County Board of Taxation, 121 N. J. L. 262; affirmed, 122 Id. 381.

The proofs before the State Board indicate that the defendant was within the exempt classification and that no profit resulted from the operation of its building during the year for which the assessment under review was made.

The judgment of the State Board of Tax Appeals will be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brunson v. Rutherford Lodge Number 547
319 A.2d 80 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.2d 783, 123 N.J.L. 506, 1939 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoboken-v-hoboken-lodge-no-74-bpoe-nj-1939.