Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken

48 A.2d 917, 134 N.J.L. 616, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 183

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 N.J. Misc. 334 →

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 12, 1946·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Circuit Court' Judge Ackerson sitting as Supreme Court Commissioner.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Oliphant, Wachenpbld, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court by Circuit Court' Judge Ackerson sitting as Supreme Court Commissioner.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Oliphant, Wachenpbld, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken, 48 A.2d 917, 134 N.J.L. 616, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 183 (N.J. 1946).

Pincite

48 A.2d 917 (Hoboken Local No. 2 v. City of Hoboken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.