Hoblitzelle v. Frechette
235 A.2d 848, 155 Conn. 734
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoblitzelle v. Frechette. Read the opinion of the Court — 156 Conn. 253 →
Opinion
RULING ON THE PLAINTIFFS’ “MOTION TO DISPENSE WITH PRINTING OF BRIEFS AND ASSIGN FOR ORAL ARGUMENT” IN THE RESERVATION FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT IN NEW HAVEN COUNTY
It appears from the hearing on the motion that the case is not ready for argument. The record has been printed. The defendants oppose the motion and demand the benefit of the period of time provided by the rules for the preparation of briefs. Consequently, the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoblitzelle v. Frechette, 235 A.2d 848, 155 Conn. 734 (Colo. 1967).
235 A.2d 848 (Hoblitzelle v. Frechette) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.