Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park

Supreme Court

Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park

315 U.S. 781, 62 S. Ct. 806

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 2, 1942

DocketNo. 836

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 315 U.S. 781 (Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park, 315 U.S. 781, 62 S. Ct. 806 (1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction and an amended opposition are granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction and an amended opposition are granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

315 U.S. 781, 62 S. Ct. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoblitzelle-v-city-of-university-park-scotus-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack