Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park

Supreme Court

Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park

315 U.S. 781, 62 S. Ct. 806

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 2, 1942·No. No. 836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction and an amended opposition are granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction and an amended opposition are granted. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. § 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied.

Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park, 315 U.S. 781, 62 S. Ct. 806 (1942).

Pincite

315 U.S. 781 (Hoblitzelle v. City of University Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related