Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Hoblitzell v. Howard

Hoblitzell v. Howard

112 A.2d 715, 18 N.J. 104, 1955 N.J. LEXIS 237
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 28, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 A.2d 715 (Hoblitzell v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoblitzell v. Howard, 112 A.2d 715, 18 N.J. 104, 1955 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1955).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ereund in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Wachenfeld, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For affirmance of disallowance of counsel fees to plaintiff and for reversal with instructions to enter judgment for defendants — Justices Oliphant and Burling — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. Agway Ins. Co.
677 A.2d 788 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.2d 715, 18 N.J. 104, 1955 N.J. LEXIS 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoblitzell-v-howard-nj-1955.