Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc.

68 F. App'x 482

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2003·No. No. 03-1045·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Lee Hobley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary [483] judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hobley v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc., No. CA-01-54-3 (W.D.Va. filed Nov. 22, 2002 and entered Nov. 25, 2002; Mar. 12, 2003; Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Lee Hobley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary [483] judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hobley v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc., No. CA-01-54-3 (W.D.Va. filed Nov. 22, 2002 and entered Nov. 25, 2002; Mar. 12, 2003; Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc., 68 F. App'x 482 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

68 F. App'x 482 (Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related