Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc.

68 F. App'x 482
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 10, 2003
DocketNo. 03-1045
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 F. App'x 482 (Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobley v. Boddie Noell Enterprises, Inc., 68 F. App'x 482 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Lee Hobley appeals the district court’s orders granting summary [483]*483judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have independently reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hobley v. Boddie-Noell Enters., Inc., No. CA-01-54-3 (W.D.Va. filed Nov. 22, 2002 and entered Nov. 25, 2002; Mar. 12, 2003; Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobley v. Law Office of S. Howard Woodson, III
983 A.2d 1000 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)
Hobley v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc
541 U.S. 976 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 F. App'x 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobley-v-boddie-noell-enterprises-inc-ca4-2003.