Hobgood v. State

128 S.E. 820, 34 Ga. App. 228, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 171
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1925
Docket16559
StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 820 (Hobgood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobgood v. State, 128 S.E. 820, 34 Ga. App. 228, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 171 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under all the facts of the case as disclosed by the record it is not made to appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to reinstate the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 820, 34 Ga. App. 228, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobgood-v-state-gactapp-1925.