Hoberock v. Hoberock

216 S.W.3d 234, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 390

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband, Gregory E. Hoberock, appeals from a second amended judgment entered in a dissolution case after remand. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).