Hober v. . New York and Pennsylvania Railway Company
115 N.E. 1041, 220 N.Y. 613, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1064
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Crane, JJ. Not voting: Hiscock, Oh. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hober v. . New York and Pennsylvania Railway Company, 115 N.E. 1041, 220 N.Y. 613, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1064 (N.Y. 1917).
115 N.E. 1041 (Hober v. . New York and Pennsylvania Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.