Hobe Sound Industrial Park, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida

594 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1717, 1992 WL 32794
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 26, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2027
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 594 So. 2d 334 (Hobe Sound Industrial Park, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobe Sound Industrial Park, Inc. v. First Union National Bank of Florida, 594 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1717, 1992 WL 32794 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

STONE, Judge.

We reverse an order denying appellants’ motion to quash service of process by publication under chapter 49, Florida Statutes. The plaintiffs’ affidavit for constructive service is facially insufficient. Tulpere v. Duval Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Jacksonville, 575 So.2d 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Wiggam v. Bamford, 562 So.2d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Bodden v. Young, 422 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). The affidavit provided only that affiant did the following as a diligent search:

(a) Checked the records of the clerk of circuit court concerning a case wherein the defendant is a party and has been unable to locate any current address for the defendant;

(b) Looked in the phone book for any pertinent listings; and

(c) Hired a private process service to locate Jack F. Townsend, III.

Affiant then stated a belief that Townsend, who appellees seek to serve individually and as resident agent, was concealing himself.

We recognize that appellees subsequently obtained affidavits reflecting additional efforts at service, supporting a claim that diligent efforts have continued to no avail. We make no determination here whether those subsequent efforts are, alone, a sufficient basis for a new affidavit for constructive service in support of any republication following remand. However, appellees are cautioned, in such event, to also consider the allegations of appellants’ counter-affidavit.

DOWNEY and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rodrigue
645 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (Court of International Trade, 2009)
Demars v. VILLAGE OR SANDALWOOD LAKES
625 So. 2d 1219 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
594 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1717, 1992 WL 32794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobe-sound-industrial-park-inc-v-first-union-national-bank-of-florida-fladistctapp-1992.