Hobby v. Waddell

227 So. 2d 253
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 20, 1969·No. No. 69-461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of a Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition, we issued a Rule Nisi and upon a response being filed set this matter for oral argument. Having heard oral argument and considered the briefs, we conclude that the Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition should be denied and the Rule Nisi discharged.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobby v. Waddell, 227 So. 2d 253 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

227 So. 2d 253 (Hobby v. Waddell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
227 So. 2d 253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)