Hobby v. State
106 So. 918, 21 Ala. App. 675
This text of 106 So. 918 (Hobby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hobby v. State, 106 So. 918, 21 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of a felony. There is no bill of exceptions. Neither is the oral charge of the court set out in the record. The charges refused to appellant will not be considered. There appearing no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 So. 918, 21 Ala. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobby-v-state-alactapp-1926.