Hobby v. Beneficial/Household Member HSBC Group

182 F. App'x 238
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 25, 2006
DocketNos. 05-2006, 05-2007, 05-2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 F. App'x 238 (Hobby v. Beneficial/Household Member HSBC Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobby v. Beneficial/Household Member HSBC Group, 182 F. App'x 238 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Geraldine Hobby seeks to appeal from the district court’s orders denying her motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her civil actions for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hobby v. Beneficial Household No. CA-05-238-JBF-TEM; Hobby v. First Baptist Church, No. CA-05-247-JBF-TEM, Hobby v. Beneficial, No. CA-05-274-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. Aug. 12, 2005). We grant Hobby’s motions to amend and file her informal brief out of time and deny her motion to transfer and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baka v. City Of Norfolk
E.D. Virginia, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobby-v-beneficialhousehold-member-hsbc-group-ca4-2006.