Hobbs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This text of Hobbs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Hobbs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Montana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION
TYLER HOBBS and ALYSSA CV 24-73-M—-DWM HOBBS, Plaintiffs, ORDER vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.
On May 24, 2024, Plaintiffs Tyler and Alyssa Hobbs sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for damages arising out of Wells Fargo’s conduct vis-a-vis the refinancing of a construction loan. (Doc. 1.) On August 12, 2024, Wells Fargo moved to dismissed for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 7.) In response, the Hobbs filed an Amended Complaint, (Doc. 12), which the parties agree moots the pending motion, (Doc. 13). See Koala v. Khosla, 931 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2019) (“[A]n amended pleading supersedes the original pleading.”’). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 7) is DENIED as MOOT. Wells Fargo must answer the Amended Complaint or
once again move to dismiss by the deadline provided for in Rule 12(a). No further extensions of time will be granted. DATED this phy of September, 2024.
WO Z| Donald W, loy, District Judge United Sté trict Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hobbs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-mtd-2024.