Hobbs v. Walker

60 Me. 184
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Me. 184 (Hobbs v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobbs v. Walker, 60 Me. 184 (Me. 1872).

Opinion

Danforth, J.

The only question involved in this case is whether an officer’s deed of an equity of redemption, not recorded within three months, is void under R. S., 1857, c. 76, § 33. In Houghton v. Bartholomew, 10 Met. 138, it was held that a similar deed-was good as against a subsequent purchaser with notice. Much: more would it seem to be good against the debtor, who, as the case-finds, had the legal notice of the sale.

The Statute of Massachusetts under which that decision was-made is the same as our own. The opinion in that case is elaborate, meeting every objection raised in the agreement, and is, in our opinion sound. Fxeeptions sustained-

Appleton, C. J.; Cutting, Walton, and Dickerson* JJ.5, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Me. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-walker-me-1872.