Hobbs v. Tennessee ex rel. State

8 So. 2d 596, 243 Ala. 102
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 11, 1942·No. 8 Div. 183·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

While we may not agree with all that is said by the Court of Appeals in the instant case, there is a dear finding by that court that the extradition proceedings were instituted to collect the balance due on a debt due by petitioner, in violation of section 68, Title 15, Code of Alabama of 1940. The finding is the result of a proper inquiry under that section of the Code, and is not reviewable here. See notes 94 A. L.R. 1499. The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

GARDNER, C. J., BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobbs v. Tennessee ex rel. State, 8 So. 2d 596, 243 Ala. 102 (Ala. 1942).

8 So. 2d 596 (Hobbs v. Tennessee ex rel. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. State
292 So. 2d 480 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Russell v. State
37 So. 2d 233 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)