Hobbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hobbs v. State

80 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 457730, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 2012

Docket1D11-2914

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 So. 3d 415 (Hobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hobbs v. State, 80 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 457730, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying her petition to seal her criminal record. The appellant contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to provide a sufficient reason for the denial based on the facts and circumstances of her individual case. We agree and reverse and remand for reconsideration of the petition. See *416 Anderson v. State, 692 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying her petition to seal her criminal record. The appellant contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to provide a sufficient reason for the denial based on the facts and circumstances of her individual case. We agree and reverse and remand for reconsideration of the petition. See *416 Anderson v. State, 692 So.2d 250 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 3d 415, 2012 WL 457730, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack