Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hobbs v. State

Hobbs v. State

899 So. 2d 507, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5538, 2005 WL 925628
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2005·No. No. 5D03-1582·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807, 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (A sentence following revocation of probation, entered on the same day as the sentence for another predicate offense, qualifies as a predicate offense for habitual offender purposes). See also Love v. State, 886 So.2d 276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

THOMPSON, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobbs v. State, 899 So. 2d 507, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5538, 2005 WL 925628 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

899 So. 2d 507 (Hobbs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Love v. State
886 So. 2d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)