Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hobbs v. State

Hobbs v. State

378 So. 2d 321, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15410
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1980
DocketNo. 79-719
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 378 So. 2d 321 (Hobbs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobbs v. State, 378 So. 2d 321, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15410 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affidavits of violation of probation were filed against appellant, one of which alleged commission of a crime. Appellant was tried and found guilty of the crime. At sentencing his probation was revoked on that ground. This procedure was proper, and it was not necessary that a separate revocation hearing be held. Franklin v. State, 356 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). However, the written order revoking probation recited additional grounds for revocation. Since no evidence was received on these violations, and appellant did not admit them, we remand with directions that those grounds be deleted from the order of revocation.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.W.H. v. State
15 So. 3d 721 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Colon v. State
898 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Isom v. State
387 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 So. 2d 321, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.