Hobbs v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.
This text of Hobbs v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P. (Hobbs v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
GEORGE E. HOBBS, JR., CARRIE § A. HOBBS, and VICTORIA § No. 408, 2023 MCGINNES, § § Court Below—Superior Court Defendants Below, § of the State of Delaware Appellants, § § C.A. No. N17L-10-086 v. § § MTGLQ INVESTORS, L.P., § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 18, 2024
ORDER
On January 31, 2024, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the
appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for their failure to
file an opening brief and appendix by the filing deadline of January 23, 2024 and
their failure to pay the Superior Court appeal preparation fee. Postal records show
that no authorized recipient was available to accept the certified mailing. On
February 16, 2024, the notice to show cause was re-sent by first class mail. A timely
response to the notice to show cause was due by February 26, 2024. To date, the
appellants have not filed an opening brief, paid the Superior Court appeal preparation fee, or responded to the notice to show cause.1 Dismissal of this appeal
is therefore deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules
3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
1 Appellant George E. Hobbs, Jr. filed a letter withdrawing the appeal in the Superior Court but did not file a notice of dismissal in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hobbs v. MTGLQ Investors, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-mtglq-investors-lp-del-2024.