Hobbs v. Longstreet

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hobbs v. Longstreet

72 Ga. 898

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 19, 1884·Published

Opinion

1. Where exception is taken to the grant of a non-suit, the evidence should be brought up in the bill of exceptions; it is only where a motion for new trial is made that the evidence can be brought up in the record. Code, §4253.

2. No notice of any motion to dismiss was given, or motion made, but upon the discovery that the evidence was not in the bill of exceptions, but in the record, the court held that it would dismiss the writ of error. (Rep.)

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1. Where exception is taken to the grant of a non-suit, the evidence should be brought up in the bill of exceptions; it is only where a motion for new trial is made that the evidence can be brought up in the record. Code, §4253.

2. No notice of any motion to dismiss was given, or motion made, but upon the discovery that the evidence was not in the bill of exceptions, but in the record, the court held that it would dismiss the writ of error. (Rep.)

Writ of error dismissed.

Hobbs v. Longstreet, 72 Ga. 898 (Ga. 1884).

Pincite

72 Ga. 898 (Hobbs v. Longstreet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.