Hobbs v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hobbs v. Hobbs

72 A. 290, 75 N.H. 590, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71

DecidedFebruary 2, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A. 290 (Hobbs v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 A. 290, 75 N.H. 590, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71 (N.H. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The evidence was admissible. The location of points which were at a known distance from the one in dispute would furnish some information upon the issue being tried. Keefe v. Railroad, ante, 116.

*591 The argument was manifestly proper. It was confined to the evidence in the case and was a temperate criticism of the devious, course which the evidence tended to show the plaintiff had taken.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslee, J.

The evidence was admissible. The location of points which were at a known distance from the one in dispute would furnish some information upon the issue being tried. Keefe v. Railroad, ante, 116.

*591 The argument was manifestly proper. It was confined to the evidence in the case and was a temperate criticism of the devious, course which the evidence tended to show the plaintiff had taken.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A. 290, 75 N.H. 590, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-hobbs-nh-1909.