Hobbs v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Hobbs v. Hobbs

72 A. 290, 75 N.H. 590, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided February 2, 1909·Published

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The evidence was admissible. The location of points which were at a known distance from the one in dispute would furnish some information upon the issue being tried. Keefe v. Railroad, ante, 116.

*591 The argument was manifestly proper. It was confined to the evidence in the case and was a temperate criticism of the devious, course which the evidence tended to show the plaintiff had taken.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peaslee, J.

The evidence was admissible. The location of points which were at a known distance from the one in dispute would furnish some information upon the issue being tried. Keefe v. Railroad, ante, 116.

*591 The argument was manifestly proper. It was confined to the evidence in the case and was a temperate criticism of the devious, course which the evidence tended to show the plaintiff had taken.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 A. 290, 75 N.H. 590, 1909 N.H. LEXIS 71 (N.H. 1909).

Pincite

72 A. 290 (Hobbs v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.