Hobbs v. Hobbs

218 N.C. 468
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 7, 1940·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee. Cueiam.

In the action instituted by Samuel H. Hobbs, he moves to dismiss the appeal for that the record contains no assignment of error. The motion is allowed. Bule 19, sec. 3, of the Eules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 824.

The judgment in the first action, having absolutely divorced the plaintiff and defendant, all rights arising out of the marriage cease, C. S., 1663, including the right to alimony under C. S., 1667. Duffy v. Duffy, 120 N. C., 346, 27 S. E., 28. Hence, motion of appellee therein that the appeal be dismissed will be treated as motion to affirm, and as such .is allowed.

On appeal in first action — Dismissed.

On appeal in second action — Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobbs v. Hobbs, 218 N.C. 468 (N.C. 1940).

218 N.C. 468 (Hobbs v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
150 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Rayfield v. Rayfield
89 S.E.2d 399 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Feldman v. Feldman
73 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Livingston v. Livingston
70 S.E.2d 480 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Jenkins v. . Jenkins
36 S.E.2d 233 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)