Hobbs v. Hobbs
70 Me. 383, 1880 Me. LEXIS 3
Opinion
This is an action of replevin by a husband against the wife, the marital relation between the parties being in full force.
Replevin is an action of tort. It was decided in Abbott v. Abbott, 67 Maine, 304, that a wife after divorce could not maintain an action for an assault committed on her during coverture.
A fortiori, an action of tort cannot be maintained by the one against the other during coverture.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me. 383, 1880 Me. LEXIS 3 (Me. 1880).
70 Me. 383 (Hobbs v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Downs v. Poulin
216 A.2d 29 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1966)
Tresher v. McElroy
106 So. 79 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)