Hobbs v. Hobbs

70 Me. 383, 1880 Me. LEXIS 3
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 6, 1880·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appleton, O. J.

This is an action of replevin by a husband against the wife, the marital relation between the parties being in full force.

Replevin is an action of tort. It was decided in Abbott v. Abbott, 67 Maine, 304, that a wife after divorce could not maintain an action for an assault committed on her during coverture.

A fortiori, an action of tort cannot be maintained by the one against the other during coverture.

Exceptions overruled.

Walton, Daneorth, Yirgin, Peters and Libbey, J J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobbs v. Hobbs, 70 Me. 383, 1880 Me. LEXIS 3 (Me. 1880).

70 Me. 383 (Hobbs v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downs v. Poulin
216 A.2d 29 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1966)
Tresher v. McElroy
106 So. 79 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)