Hobbs v. Fuller

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Hobbs v. Fuller

75 Mass. 98

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Mass. 98 (Hobbs v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hobbs v. Fuller, 75 Mass. 98 (Mass. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Thomas, J.

This bill is brought too late. The entry having been made by the defendant on the 10th of February 1852, the foreclosure became perfect on the 10th of February 1855. The possession taken by the defendant was in conformity with the provisions of the statutes, and there is no evidence from which [100]*100a waiver of his possession could have been inferred. Rev. Sts. c. 107, § 1. Raymond v. Raymond, 7 Cush. 605. Swift v. Mendall, 8 Cush. 357. Bennett v. Conant, 10 Cush. 163. Palmer v. Fowley, 5 Gray, 545. Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomas, J.

This bill is brought too late. The entry having been made by the defendant on the 10th of February 1852, the foreclosure became perfect on the 10th of February 1855. The possession taken by the defendant was in conformity with the provisions of the statutes, and there is no evidence from which [100]*100a waiver of his possession could have been inferred. Rev. Sts. c. 107, § 1. Raymond v. Raymond, 7 Cush. 605. Swift v. Mendall, 8 Cush. 357. Bennett v. Conant, 10 Cush. 163. Palmer v. Fowley, 5 Gray, 545. Bill dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Mass. 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-fuller-mass-1857.