Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville
This text of 352 So. 2d 164 (Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether the “counterclaims” sought by appellant to be belatedly filed were “permissible” or “compulsory” within the meaning of those terms as used in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a rabbit trail which we do not elect to pursue, nor is it necessary that that issue be now or here resolved. We do find, however, that the summary judgment of foreclosure of real property here appealed was properly entered (insofar as are concerned the points presented on appeal). Accordingly, no prejudicial error having been demonstrated, the said summary final judgment of foreclosure is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
352 So. 2d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-florida-first-national-bank-of-jacksonville-fladistctapp-1977.