Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville

352 So. 2d 164
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 30, 1977
DocketNo. FF-213
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 352 So. 2d 164 (Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville, 352 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whether the “counterclaims” sought by appellant to be belatedly filed were “permissible” or “compulsory” within the meaning of those terms as used in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a rabbit trail which we do not elect to pursue, nor is it necessary that that issue be now or here resolved. We do find, however, that the summary judgment of foreclosure of real property here appealed was properly entered (insofar as are concerned the points presented on appeal). Accordingly, no prejudicial error having been demonstrated, the said summary final judgment of foreclosure is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobbs v. FLORIDA FIRST NAT. BANK
480 So. 2d 153 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
352 So. 2d 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-florida-first-national-bank-of-jacksonville-fladistctapp-1977.