Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville

352 So. 2d 164

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 1977·No. No. FF-213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whether the “counterclaims” sought by appellant to be belatedly filed were “permissible” or “compulsory” within the meaning of those terms as used in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a rabbit trail which we do not elect to pursue, nor is it necessary that that issue be now or here resolved. We do find, however, that the summary judgment of foreclosure of real property here appealed was properly entered (insofar as are concerned the points presented on appeal). Accordingly, no prejudicial error having been demonstrated, the said summary final judgment of foreclosure is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whether the “counterclaims” sought by appellant to be belatedly filed were “permissible” or “compulsory” within the meaning of those terms as used in the Rules of Civil Procedure is a rabbit trail which we do not elect to pursue, nor is it necessary that that issue be now or here resolved. We do find, however, that the summary judgment of foreclosure of real property here appealed was properly entered (insofar as are concerned the points presented on appeal). Accordingly, no prejudicial error having been demonstrated, the said summary final judgment of foreclosure is

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville, 352 So. 2d 164 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

352 So. 2d 164 (Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank of Jacksonville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related