Hobbs v. Evans
This text of 160 S.E. 872 (Hobbs v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This application for the writ of habeas corpus involves the question of the jurisdiction of the city court of Macon to entertain and determine the questions involved in the application for the writ. Under the facts alleged, the case is controlled by the principle decided in the cases of Broomhead v. Chisholm, 47 Ga. 390, 392, and Simmons v. Ga. Iron & Coal Co., 117 Ga. 305 (43 S. E. 780, 61 L. R. A. 739). The judge of the city court of Macon erred in dismissing the application and the writ of habeas corpus, on the ground that he was without jurisdiction to try the case. As to the authority of city-court judges to issue writs of habeas corpus and to hear and dispose of same, see Michie’s Code, § 4831(17); Park’s Ann. Code, § 4831 (q); Penal Code, 1910, § 1293; Acts 1884-85, p. 472, sec. 10.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 S.E. 872, 173 Ga. 610, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-v-evans-ga-1931.