Hobbs Steel Erectors v. Bashline
This text of 179 So. 2d 97 (Hobbs Steel Erectors v. Bashline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have heard oral argument on the petition and cross-petition for certiorari to review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission which affirmed in part an order of a deputy commissioner granting certain compensation benefits and remanded part of the order for further findings of fact thereto.
A careful study of the record and briefs leads us to conclude that the petition and cross-petition should be denied.
The petition for fees for the attorneys’ services relative to the cross-petition is denied also.
The attorneys for respondent Ronald Bashline are awarded a fee in the amount of Three hundred fifty dollars ($350.00) for services in this Court.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 So. 2d 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobbs-steel-erectors-v-bashline-fla-1965.