Hobart v. Schuler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hobart v. Schuler

80 A.D.2d 964, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10867

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hobart v. Schuler. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 A.D.2d 916 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 1981·Published

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, [965]*965this court certifies .that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness óf its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Was the order of Special Term, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, correct as a matter of law?” Sweeney, J.P., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, [965]*965this court certifies .that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness óf its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: “Was the order of Special Term, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, correct as a matter of law?” Sweeney, J.P., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.

Hobart v. Schuler, 80 A.D.2d 964, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

80 A.D.2d 964 (Hobart v. Schuler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.