Hobart v. Jordan

58 N.H. 500
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided August 5, 1878·Published

Opinion

Stanley, J.

If the defendant has a remedy, it is in equity. Noble v. Googins, 99 Mass. 231; Spurr v. Benedict, 99 Mass. 463; Wells v. Day, 124 Mass. 38; Grymes v. Sanders, 93 U. S. 55. The timber was removed from a portion of the land, and the proceeds were paid to the plaintiff. He cannot, therefore, be exactly and wholly restored to his former position : and if the contract of purchase can be rescinded by restoring part of the property and paying for the rest, it must be done upon such an adjustment of the equities as cannot be made in this suit. Scott v. Littledale, 8 E. & B. 815.

Judgment on the verdict.

Doe, C. J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hobart v. Jordan, 58 N.H. 500 (N.H. 1878).

58 N.H. 500 (Hobart v. Jordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimes v. Sanders
93 U.S. 55 (Supreme Court, 1876)
Noble v. Googins
99 Mass. 231 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Spurr v. Benedict
99 Mass. 463 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Wells v. Day
124 Mass. 38 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)