Hobart v. Hobart
This text of 234 A.D. 889 (Hobart v. Hobart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate order reducing alimony reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, but without prejudice to defendant’s making a new application under section 1170 of the Civil Practice Act. As leave to make the application was not had, the order modifying the amended judgment is void under section 1170. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompldns and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobart-v-hobart-nyappdiv-1931.