Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz
This text of 622 P.2d 948 (Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*949 ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
There having been noneompliance with Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., in that the crossclaims of the appellant against the State of Wyoming have not been determined, therefore the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties were determined upon issuance of an order granting partial summary judgment, and there being no express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977); Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc., Wyo., 541 P.2d 49 (1975); Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp., Wyo., 598 P.2d 812 (1979), pursuant to Rules 1.04 and 1.05 and 16, W.R.A.P., upon motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Urroz, it is
ORDERED that the entitled appeal be and is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
622 P.2d 948, 1981 Wyo. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoback-ranches-inc-v-urroz-wyo-1981.