HOARDES v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

HOARDES v. State

1 So. 3d 377, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 667, 2009 WL 211905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 30, 2009

Docket1D07-0356

StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 377 (HOARDES v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

HOARDES v. State, 1 So. 3d 377, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 667, 2009 WL 211905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant correctly asserts that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis as a lesser included offense of the sale of cannabis. See State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939, 941 (Fla.1991). We, therefore, reverse appellant’s conviction as to count I. In all other respects, we affirm.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant correctly asserts that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis as a lesser included offense of the sale of cannabis. See State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939, 941 (Fla.1991). We, therefore, reverse appellant’s conviction as to count I. In all other respects, we affirm.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 So. 3d 377, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 667, 2009 WL 211905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoardes-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack