Hoard, III, William H. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.

2018 TN WC 93
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 2, 2018
Docket2018-01-0111
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 93 (Hoard, III, William H. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoard, III, William H. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corp., 2018 TN WC 93 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Jul 02, 2018 10:52 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT CHATTANOOGA William H. Hoard, IIE, ) Docket No.: 2018-01-0111 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 11612-2018 ) Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., ) Judge Audrey A. Headrick Employer. ) )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

This matter came before the Court on June 15, 2018, on the Request for Expedited Hearing filed by William H. Hoard, IIJ. The central legal issue is whether he is likely to establish at a hearing on the merits that he is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Hoard is not entitled to the requested benefits at this time.

History of Claim Notice

Mr. Hoard alleges he sustained a back injury while performing heavy lifting at Pilgrim’s Pride. His date of injury is unclear. According to the Petition for Benefit Determination (PBD) and the Dispute Certification Notice (DCN), he injured his back on May 22, 2017. However, Mr. Hoard’s affidavit stated he injured his back on December 21, 2017, but he testified he injured his back on December 21, 2016. Mr. Hoard filed his PBD in June 2017, eight months after Pilgrim’s Pride terminated him.

Mr. Hoard admitted he never gave notice of a back injury to anyone at Pilgrim’s Pride except Robbie Brown, the company’s Nurse Manager. However, he also testified he never reported his injury to keep his job. Mr. Hoard said he saw Ms. Brown on March 5, 2017, and told her he injured his back lifting heavy tubs. The nurse’s records, however, contain no record of him visiting the First Aid clinic on March 5. The proof also established that March 5 fell on a Sunday, and Mr. Hoard only worked weekdays. Ms. Brown’s testimony differed significantly. She stated she never saw him before the hearing. Ms. Brown explained that nurses under her assist employees in First Aid while she performs other duties. She stated Pilgrim’s Pride uses an elaborate tracking system when employees report to First Aid, even if it is only for a band aid. Further, Ms. Brown did not know about Mr. Hoard’s claim until March 5, 2018, which is when she documented his claim.

Nathan Hilton, Mr. Hoard’s supervisor, confirmed that Mr. Hoard never asked to see the nurse or complained of a work-related back problem before his termination. Mr. Hilton stated he would have sent Mr. Hoard to the nurse if he requested treatment. However, Mr. Hilton did recall Mr. Hoard clocking out to go to the emergency room on December 21, 2016.

Mr. Hoard testified he decided to file a workers’ compensation claim after Pilgrim’s Pride terminated him.

Medical Proof

Mr. Hoard testified that he sought treatment on his own after Mr. Hilton allegedly refused to let him see the nurse. The December 21, 2016 emergency room record reflects that he reported doing heavy lifting at work and complained of pelvic and bilateral thigh pain that began the prior day. The medical provider diagnosed an abdominal muscle strain.

Mr. Hoard returned to the emergency room in February and May of 2017 due to low back pain. He told the provider he thought his back pain came from “working at the chicken house.” The medical provider diagnosed lumbar radiculopathy. In the interim, Mr. Hoard also saw Dr. Bess Ingram. However, none of the physicians gave a causation opinion regarding Mr. Hoard’s back condition.

Credibility Mr. Hoard’s testimony yielded numerous discrepancies. For example:

e He marked “no” in response to a question on Pilgrim’s Pride’s application regarding whether Mr. Hoard had ever been convicted of a felony. Mr. Hoard, however, later admitted to two felony convictions. He said he omitted them because he had “never been convicted of a crime in Chattanooga,” and he left his past behind him in California when he moved to start a new life. e Mr. Hoard, and his witness, Jessica McNeese, testified he had no injuries before his alleged back injury at Pilgrim’s Pride.’ After refreshing his memory with a Facebook video, Mr. Hoard recalled a serious go-cart accident that required emergency medical care immediately before Pilgrim’s Pride hired him.

e Mr. Hoard and Ms. McNeese testified he could not climb ladders due to his back. A May 2018 Facebook photo refreshed his memory of standing on a ladder while holding a hammer. Mr. Hoard stated it was a staged photo.

e Mr. Hoard and Ms. McNeese stated he uses a cane most of the time and uses his mother’s wheelchair for long distances.” Video taken two days before the hearing showed Mr. Hoard hurriedly going up and down a flight of stairs with no apparent difficulty. He stated he has good days and bad.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To prevail at an expedited hearing, Mr. Hoard must provide sufficient evidence to show he would likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(1) (2017). He failed to provide sufficient evidence.

As to notice, Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-201(a) provides that an injured employee must give written notice of an injury within fifteen days absent the employer’s actual knowledge of the accident. Further, Section 50-6-201(a)(3) provides that any defect or inaccuracy in the notice will not bar compensation “unless the employer can show, to the satisfaction of the workers’ compensation judge before which the matter is pending, that the employer was prejudiced by the failure to give the proper notice, and then only to the extent of the prejudice.”

Here, the Court finds that Mr. Hoard gave no notice of his back injury to Pilgrim’s Pride until approximately eight months after his termination. While Mr. Hoard said he told Ms. Brown about his alleged back injury, she testified she never met him before the hearing. The Court found Ms. Brown credible and credits her testimony. The Court further finds that Mr. Hoard’s reason for failing to give notice is not believable. He testified he did not give notice because he wanted to keep his job. However, Pilgrim’s Pride terminated him in June 2017, and Mr. Hoard waited for approximately eight months to file a PBD. Although section 50-6-201(a)(3) provides some latitude, it does not give employees a free pass to give notice at their leisure. To construe the statute otherwise would render it meaningless. Therefore, the Court holds that Mr. Hoard is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on the notice issue.

' Ms. McNeese lives with Mr. Hoard.

2 The records reflect that no medical provider recommended that Mr. Hoard use a cane or a wheelchair. Mr, Hoard’s credibility is intricately tied to the notice issue. Pilgrim’s Pride repeatedly impeached his testimony throughout the hearing, and Mr. Hoard failed to offer plausible explanations for the discrepancies. The Court did not find his testimony credible. Further, aside from Mr. Hoard’s failure to give notice, he also failed to show, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, that his work duties “contributed more than fifty “percent (50%) in causing the injury, considering all causes.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 102(14)(C). Therefore, the Court holds that Mr. Hoard is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving his work caused his injury.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows: 1. Mr. Hoard’s requested relief is denied at this time.

2. This matter is set for a Status Hearing on Friday, August 31, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. You must call 423-634-0164 or toll-free at 855-383-0001 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without your participation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6
Tennessee § 50-6

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoard-iii-william-h-v-pilgrims-pride-corp-tennworkcompcl-2018.