Hoar v. Public Service Electric Co.
134 A. 184, 4 N.J. Misc. 716, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 127
Opinion
Plaintiff has a verdict for $5,500.
The deceased was a boy slightly under seventeen years of age, of limited education, physically strong, but indolent and unambitious.
The only ground urged is that the verdict is excessive. We think it is, and unless plaintiff will consent to a reduction to the sum of $4,000 the rule to show cause will be made absolute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoar v. Public Service Electric Co., 134 A. 184, 4 N.J. Misc. 716, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 127 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 184 (Hoar v. Public Service Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lane v. Hatfield
143 P.2d 230 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1943)
Sakos v. Byers
168 A. 222 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1933)