Hoar v. Flegal
1 Pennyp. 208
Opinion
The record in this case is perfectly regular. That one of the panel of jurors was personated by a stranger was a matter only to be remedied on a motion for a new trial. It could not be reached by a motion in arrest of judgment, nor on error. The plaintiff in error is estopped by the record from alleging anything which contradicts it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoar v. Flegal, 1 Pennyp. 208 (Pa. 1881).
1 Pennyp. 208 (Hoar v. Flegal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodward & Williamson's Assessment
118 A. 552 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)