Hoar v. Flegal
1 Pennyp. 208
This text of 1 Pennyp. 208 (Hoar v. Flegal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoar v. Flegal, 1 Pennyp. 208 (Pa. 1881).
Opinion
The record in this case is perfectly regular. That one of the panel of jurors was personated by a stranger was a matter only to be remedied on a motion for a new trial. It could not be reached by a motion in arrest of judgment, nor on error. The plaintiff in error is estopped by the record from alleging anything which contradicts it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Woodward & Williamson's Assessment
118 A. 552 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Pennyp. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoar-v-flegal-pa-1881.