Hoar v. Flegal

1 Pennyp. 208
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 15, 1881·No. No. 165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The record in this case is perfectly regular. That one of the panel of jurors was personated by a stranger was a matter only to be remedied on a motion for a new trial. It could not be reached by a motion in arrest of judgment, nor on error. The plaintiff in error is estopped by the record from alleging anything which contradicts it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hoar v. Flegal, 1 Pennyp. 208 (Pa. 1881).

1 Pennyp. 208 (Hoar v. Flegal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodward & Williamson's Assessment
118 A. 552 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)