Hoai Thanh v. Hien T. Ngo

Fourth Circuit

Hoai Thanh v. Hien T. Ngo

684 F. App'x 307

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 6, 2017

DocketNo. 16-1391, No. 16-1397

StatusPublished

This text of 684 F. App'x 307 (Hoai Thanh v. Hien T. Ngo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoai Thanh v. Hien T. Ngo, 684 F. App'x 307 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Hoai Thanh appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying his motions to reconsider a prior order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in the underlying defamation action, and (2) denying his motions to reconsider the dismissal of his independent complaint asserting fraud upon the court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the district court’s opinions, and havé found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoai Thanh v. Hien Ngo, Nos. 8:11-cv-01992-PJM; 8:15-cv-03441-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2016; May 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Hoai Thanh appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying his motions to reconsider a prior order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant in the underlying defamation action, and (2) denying his motions to reconsider the dismissal of his independent complaint asserting fraud upon the court, Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d). We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as well as the district court’s opinions, and havé found no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoai Thanh v. Hien Ngo, Nos. 8:11-cv-01992-PJM; 8:15-cv-03441-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 5, 2016; May 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 F. App'x 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoai-thanh-v-hien-t-ngo-ca4-2017.