Hoagland v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Hoagland v. State

539 N.W.2d 392, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 966, 1995 WL 681470

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 2, 1995

DocketNo. C3-95-563

StatusPublished

This text of 539 N.W.2d 392 (Hoagland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoagland v. State, 539 N.W.2d 392, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 966, 1995 WL 681470 (Mich. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI