Hoagland v. State
539 N.W.2d 392, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 966, 1995 WL 681470
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hoagland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Minn. LEXIS 416 →
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the district court dated March 2,1995, denying defendant, Leland M. Hoagland, a new trial after a remand hearing pursuant to Hoagland v. State, 518 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1994) be, and the same is, affirmed. The trial court on remand concluded, on the basis of detailed findings, that the state had met its burden of proving that the state would be unduly prejudiced by having to retry the case. Affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoagland v. State, 539 N.W.2d 392, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 966, 1995 WL 681470 (Mich. 1995).
539 N.W.2d 392 (Hoagland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoagland v. State
518 N.W.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1994)