Hoagland v. State
This text of 736 So. 2d 136 (Hoagland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), [137]*137and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoagland-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.