Hoagland v. State
736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), [137]*137and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoagland v. State, 736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
736 So. 2d 136 (Hoagland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boston v. State
722 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Spencer v. State
717 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)