Hoagland v. State

736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 30, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2517
StatusPublished

This text of 736 So. 2d 136 (Hoagland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoagland v. State, 736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), [137]*137and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boston v. State
722 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Spencer v. State
717 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 So. 2d 136, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8653, 1999 WL 435471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoagland-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.